|
Post by wrekinwanderer on Jun 9, 2013 14:48:30 GMT -8
Anyway, I'm considering lengthening the batchbox for my 6" system, to try and get a bit of a longer burn and some more energy going into my Apostol Engineering style water heater. It took me ages to finally track down what Peterberg had to say about a longer batchbox and finally found it on the last page of the Adventures with horizontal feed...
It ends with an invitation from Perterberg, which I shall repeat below:
Have any of you lot had a go at lowering the ceiling and changing the port dimensions?
|
|
|
Post by grizbach on Jun 9, 2013 16:11:01 GMT -8
Each build will need a different box size/primary intake according to the draft. The draft of each setup is a main variable of the equation.
|
|
|
Post by wrekinwanderer on Jun 10, 2013 13:58:43 GMT -8
Of course. But that's where the ratios come in isn't it?.....
|
|
|
Post by grizbach on Jun 10, 2013 23:16:45 GMT -8
I'll use my build as an example. The maximum I can fill my batch box is about 7/8. Even this can be overly rich at times. I am safe at 3/4 full. Now this is maximum efficiency for my build. If I had a stronger draft or less bells, I could fill the box all the way and have an efficient burn.
By lowering the ceiling, you are talking about changing the fuel charge aren't you?
|
|
|
Post by wrekinwanderer on Jun 11, 2013 4:53:58 GMT -8
The quote where "lowering the ceiling" comes from is from Peterberg. I assume it means decreasing the height of the firebox, thereby changing the batchbox ratio.
|
|
|
Post by satamax on Jun 11, 2013 21:51:02 GMT -8
I have a diferent ratio on mine, 30x30 X47~ for the one in the water heater (green thing if you've seen it. And 30x30X50 on the 8 incher barbecue. What i find with the barbie, it's that it takes à while to heat up. Both systems are horizontal batch rockets. With no Pchanel.
|
|