|
|
Post by pianomark on Apr 24, 2021 9:18:28 GMT -8
Check out the CO2 graph here: climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/I count eight times the CO2 level has been below 200 ppm. Are you suggesting that "all life on earth" has ended (and restarted?) eight times? CO2 has been in the 200s range as recently as 200 years ago. I am glad most life forms didn't hear about it, and were able to survive. The graph also suggests how 400+ ppm just might be a problem. Facts indeed do matter. I'm just the messenger, please don't shoot me..... |
|
|
|
Post by gadget on Apr 24, 2021 12:39:55 GMT -8
Check out the CO2 graph here: climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/I count eight times the CO2 level has been below 200 ppm. Are you suggesting that "all life on earth" has ended (and restarted?) eight times? CO2 has been in the 200s range as recently as 200 years ago. I am glad most life forms didn't hear about it, and were able to survive. The graph also suggests how 400+ ppm just might be a problem. Facts indeed do matter. I'm just the messenger, please don't shoot me..... Ok, so I was off by 50 ppm, whats your graph telling us about banning CO2?  ?? sepwww.stanford.edu/sep/jon/climate.html#:~:text=The%20amount%20of%20CO2%20in,of%20150%20ppm%20to%20survive ".......The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere was reduced by about 90% during the last 150 million years. If this trend continues CO2 will inevitably fall to levels that threaten the survival of plants, which require a minimum of 150 ppm to survive....."
".........Even at today's concentration of 400 ppm plants are relatively starved for nutrition. The optimum level of CO2 for plant growth is about 5 times higher. CO2 is the giver of life. We should celebrate CO2 rather than denigrate it as is the fashion today............"
|
|
|
|
Post by hallinen on Apr 24, 2021 14:01:04 GMT -8
Patrick Moore, PhD worked for a plastic company, was a board member of a power company, worked for logging and mining companies, and his PhD in Forestry does not qualify him as a climate scientist. I’m married to an atmospheric scientist, I’ve been reading climate papers at breakfast since 1993. I’m not an expert, but I’m more qualified than that guy! But back to the awesome world of rocket stove creations...,I want to see more of Peter’s and other folks hot stuff!
|
|
|
|
Post by gadget on Apr 24, 2021 15:23:28 GMT -8
Patrick Moore, PhD worked for a plastic company, was a board member of a power company, worked for logging and mining companies, and his PhD in Forestry does not qualify him as a climate scientist. I’m married to an atmospheric scientist, I’ve been reading climate papers at breakfast since 1993. I’m not an expert, but I’m more qualified than that guy! But back to the awesome world of rocket stove creations...,I want to see more of Peter’s and other folks hot stuff! There are MANY more that agree. Of course there is also those with an agenda. I've seen "scientist" so smart they can't even open their car doors. Point is, CO2 global warming doom is total Bull$hit If you want to believe what the commies taught you in school go ahead.....bahhaaaaa (sheep) |
|
lsch
New Member
Posts: 18
|
Post by lsch on Apr 25, 2021 12:51:23 GMT -8
I knew it was going to fall on the dark side of the force.
"Point is, CO2 global warming doom is total Bull$hit
If you want to believe what the commies taught you in school go ahead.....bahhaaaaa (sheep)"
one more little effort gadget and you reach the "godwin point".
I'm not even going to argue because as they say in France:
one does not make drink a donkey which is not thirsty
|
|
|
|
Post by Vortex on May 5, 2021 14:40:18 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by satamax on May 12, 2021 17:56:52 GMT -8
|
|
??
