vanbc
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by vanbc on Jul 13, 2014 21:29:46 GMT -8
Well you know how surfing the web works. One link leads to another and I came across this, www.fluecube.com/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2014 2:31:27 GMT -8
ridiculous
"which consists of a cubic combustion chamber"
Anyway, I do not believe in anything but myself.
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Jul 14, 2014 4:21:26 GMT -8
Looks like a secondary combustion chamber. Others have been working on trying to get a complete combustion after the original vortex and in standard stoves.
I was ignored for about 6 months when I insisted that windows could be added to a RMH. Now look. We have windows. Anything is possible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2014 4:45:34 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Jul 14, 2014 8:06:55 GMT -8
Personally, I would save up the money and get a better stove. But whatever. If this is a quick way out for someone, then it is their house. And if the cube works, then more power to them.
P.S. Never was a big fan of Einstein and I do believe a secondary combustion chamber shouldn't be at the end of the line.
Thanks for sharing, Van. I hope you post more.
|
|
|
Post by photoman290 on Jul 15, 2014 10:09:51 GMT -8
it looks like it just catches the particulates in the inverted cone and they drop back down the flue. this would appear to reduce smoke, but a proper wood fire made with dry wood wont smoke anyway. one born every minutes seems appropriate. bit like putting a go faster exhaust on your car. just because it is patented doesn't mean it works, just one else has thought of it before you.
|
|
|
Post by photoman290 on Jul 15, 2014 10:30:36 GMT -8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2014 3:57:10 GMT -8
Lots of people have successfully patented the wheel, which clearly shows the whole system is a scam.
Obviously filing a patent is far to cheap. Everyone advertising with a pending patent should be sentenced to at least one year in prison.
|
|