|
Post by independentenergy on Nov 30, 2017 23:46:09 GMT -8
Last night I thought of a way to be able to cook with a rocket without all the little drawbacks we know. This design was born: youtu.be/c8qO94TumuwI have to figure out some things, the size and location of the combustion tunnel and the size of the firebox. but according to you may be valid? the cooking plate exceeded 400 degrees at the first start. how would you make the secondary air channel?
|
|
|
Post by Orange on Dec 1, 2017 2:37:34 GMT -8
look like a batch box. Why not keeep the riser around 1m and cook on top?
|
|
|
Post by independentenergy on Dec 1, 2017 4:04:46 GMT -8
Hi charging would be uncomfortable because it is too low. the idea would be, cooking plate on the core as it is used by my parts, and riser that ends in an oven and then comes out in the bell
|
|
|
Post by travis on Dec 18, 2017 7:14:48 GMT -8
Yes this seems to be similar to a sidewinder batch box system. What are the drawbacks you want to solve?
|
|
|
Post by pinhead on Dec 18, 2017 12:15:41 GMT -8
This isn't a proper rocket stove because you're extracting heat before combustion is complete.
It's simply an L-shaped wood burner. It's probably effective for its use but it's not a true "Rocket."
|
|
|
Post by travis on Dec 18, 2017 23:14:47 GMT -8
Good point pinhead
|
|
|
Post by independentenergy on Dec 19, 2017 0:08:25 GMT -8
This isn't a proper rocket stove because you're extracting heat before combustion is complete. It's simply an L-shaped wood burner. It's probably effective for its use but it's not a true "Rocket." even if the heat is extracted before reaching the combustion tunnel, it does not mean it is not a rocket stove. in Peter's box, if a cooking plate is used above the core, a rocket stove remains. obviously we have to accept a compromise, in which system there are no compromises? the strengths of this design are the high heat on the cooking plate, the riser can enter an oven and you do not have to kneel to load the wood every time. all interesting things for me
|
|