helm
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by helm on May 28, 2019 0:45:37 GMT -8
better direct the air over the top after the firewood is well lit. One inch narrow air inlet. You will see the best result.
|
|
|
Post by peterberg on May 28, 2019 1:15:13 GMT -8
better direct the air over the top after the firewood is well lit. One inch narrow air inlet. You will see the best result. Hi Helm, welcome to the boards. How do you know for sure air over the top is better? How do you know one inch by which width will do the trick? In what way the result (see diagrams) would be better? Are you doing the same research in parallel? Or is this all just gut feeling?
|
|
helm
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by helm on May 28, 2019 2:05:31 GMT -8
Hi Peter. I have experience. I work with another system. The inch for the initial sample. The air gap decreases with time by the end of the cycle.
|
|
helm
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by helm on Jun 8, 2019 10:06:06 GMT -8
Hi Peter, what should I offer as payment for testing this device according to the scheme I suggested?
|
|
|
Post by peterberg on Jun 8, 2019 11:35:26 GMT -8
Hi Peter, what should I offer as payment for testing this device according to the scheme I suggested? Hmmm... I wasn't aware of a scheme for testing (my development core?) that you suggested. And second, I won't do other people's testing schemes, my own to-do-list is already longer than I would like. I'd suggest you build your own core and spend your own time and money to test it.
|
|
helm
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by helm on Jun 8, 2019 14:10:43 GMT -8
Thanks for the advice. I will buy a measuring device, make a kernel according to your scheme ... It seemed to me that you are ready for discoveries. I proposed a scheme that will significantly reduce the cost of the path to the goal. If you continue the search through the method of scientific tests, then after many many attempts, you would come exactly to the scheme proposed by me.
|
|
|
Post by peterberg on Jun 8, 2019 21:55:43 GMT -8
Thanks for the advice. I will buy a measuring device, make a kernel according to your scheme ... It seemed to me that you are ready for discoveries. I proposed a scheme that will significantly reduce the cost of the path to the goal. If you continue the search through the method of scientific tests, then after many many attempts, you would come exactly to the scheme proposed by me. And that scheme is? Please specify, what you wrote earlier is not clear at all.
|
|
helm
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by helm on Jun 8, 2019 22:45:24 GMT -8
better direct the air over the top after the firewood is well lit. One inch narrow air inlet. You will see the best result.
|
|
|
Post by martyn on Jun 8, 2019 23:27:28 GMT -8
Hi Helm, you seem a bit mysterious! Could you please give us a bit more information about your experiences ... it all sounds very interesting but it is not very clear what you have built and discovered.
|
|
helm
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by helm on Jun 8, 2019 23:43:04 GMT -8
Hi Martyn, do you need an attractive taxi? Or do you need to get somewhere?
|
|
|
Post by peterberg on Jun 8, 2019 23:59:20 GMT -8
better direct the air over the top after the firewood is well lit. One inch narrow air inlet. You will see the best result. This is what I meant by not clear. Please specify the placement of the air inlet, how wide it is in cm², which source of air is admitted to the firewood before the air is directed over the top. And I agree with Martyn, what have you done to be so sure. What bugs me is that you seem to expect two entirely different systems to behave exactly the same. Also, maybe your use of terms is a bit off. In English language, "you will see" is very, very sure for example, "you might see" is a possibility. I'd think it's impossible to be absolutely certain about behaviour of a combustion core you've never seen in real life, let alone seen it running.
|
|
helm
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by helm on Jun 9, 2019 0:42:40 GMT -8
|
|
helm
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by helm on Jun 9, 2019 2:21:09 GMT -8
"In English language, "you will see" is very, very sure for example, "you might see" is a possibility."
You will see if you conduct the experiment diligently. If you exclude a biased approach, then you will see.
|
|
|
Post by peterberg on Jun 9, 2019 3:53:15 GMT -8
Hmmm... I could do that, just to satisfy my curiosity. Not because you are overly friendly and helpful enough to explain what you meant when asked for. Now we all know the placement of the air inlet you mentioned and the width of it, finally. It seems to me this one inch gap is probably half of what is required. Could you please explain why you think this is the right size for this specific core?
Who does not want to explain - comes up with excuses.
|
|
helm
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by helm on Jun 9, 2019 4:18:32 GMT -8
I'm not saying that this particular size is correct. This is the base size for further development. What is important is not the size but its position. The size is selected in each case empirically and individually in a particular device. Who wants to see the main thing will see. See the root. I advocate the removal of my proposals if they create such big problems.
|
|