|
Post by satamax on Feb 12, 2015 8:28:56 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by peterberg on Feb 12, 2015 11:32:25 GMT -8
Hi Max, That's easy, lots of graphs are around. Here are some of the innovator's gathering: Here's an older one: And here some of Matt's batch box at home. s65.photobucket.com/user/mremine/media/LVBatch10214test3.jpg.htmlOf course there are lots more publicized, and a huge amount of diagrams which never has been on the web at all. Do you want to have some from the small scale development as well?
|
|
|
Post by satamax on Feb 12, 2015 11:46:33 GMT -8
Peter, some from the small scale development would be fantastic too.
Thanks a lot!
|
|
|
Post by peterberg on Feb 13, 2015 5:57:43 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by matthewwalker on Feb 13, 2015 22:24:29 GMT -8
There are lots at my photobucket site you can give him...
|
|
|
Post by talltuk on Mar 3, 2015 7:57:57 GMT -8
Hi gents. Looking to get a new analyser and have been looking at the TPI 716 that Andy (Morttico) is using. Its CO sensor has a maximum of 10000 ppm and can be changed for an upgrade if 100000 ppm. What is the highest CO you can recall recording? Tom
|
|
|
Post by peterberg on Mar 3, 2015 10:58:33 GMT -8
My Testo 330-2 isn't going any further than 8000 ppm. But this variant does sport a automatic dilution feature which kicks in when the CO is too high. That way, you'll be able to keep recording. By the way, when the level would be more than 10000 ppm, the heater is smoking like mad. And chances are the thing will stop anyway.
|
|
|
Post by talltuk on Mar 3, 2015 14:35:34 GMT -8
Yeah I almost had my hands on the 335, the absolute rolls royce but ebay messed up and didn't accept my bids. Andy seems to have good results though with his, though it doesn't have the bwlls and whistles. The replacement sensor goes up to 100k and converts from ppm to a percentage.
|
|
|
Post by DCish on Mar 4, 2015 13:33:21 GMT -8
Anybody renting these things out that anyone knows of (guessing that's a loooong shot...)?
|
|
morticcio
Full Member
"The problem with internet quotes is that you can't always depend on their accuracy" - Aristotle
Posts: 371
|
Post by morticcio on Mar 5, 2015 3:57:45 GMT -8
The TPI 716 isn't as refined as the Testo 330-2LL. Features like the condensate filter in the analyser itself and one-piece connector on the bottom of the analyser show Testo have thought about the design. On the TPI the condensate filter is in-line on the hose and the connections for temp & pump are separate on the top of the analyser body. Having used the TPI I can see that re-zeroing in place would be nice - saves having to take it outside in the fresh air to re-zero.
Data logging is simple enough (software is included) but the charts are basic to say the least. I exported the data into Excel and created my own charts to try to mimic the ones Peter has posted for easy comparison. However, Excel charts don't support more than two Y axis so you need an add-on (Multi-Y) to display the CO, O2, Eff & Stack readings.
Would I buy another? Hmmmm... the TPI works well for me, but if you can justify the cost save up for a Testo.
|
|
|
Post by talltuk on Mar 5, 2015 16:16:49 GMT -8
Yeah being a gas engineer this will get a lot of work so i think the cheaper for now. How long have you had it running for during a test Andy?
|
|