|
Post by satamax on Jul 24, 2015 20:43:09 GMT -8
Is it necessary, i don't know. "warning, i'm theorizing again, no plan to test at any time soon" So if anybody wants to do the tests, hey, your welcome. Re watching this video again and again. I was wondering if it could be possible to implement a Walker type secondary air at the entrance of the burn tunnel of a J tube, or slightly downstream, so this oscilating movement would arise in the burn tunnel, and enhance the mixing ahead of the heat riser. Just a thought. Then, the rest of the daydream is. Would that be better than the shelf in a cooking type L tube? I would be tempted to say yes! And last but not least, could this lead to a portless batchbox? I mean, a big L tube, of serious dimensions, which would be cramed with wood, but short of the secondary air tube, and this tube would do the mixing. We already know it works with a Peter type ported batch box. But could this be the mixing trick, for a smoke belcher? Well, all this is food for thoughts innit?
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Jul 25, 2015 1:36:19 GMT -8
Since all I would use a stove for is outside cooking, then no. Keep the stream nice and smooth for a good draft. Also, you don't need a whole lot to cook food. I'm interested to see how Joseph's stove does with the vertical burn. The size of the venturi will make a difference. I have discovered this burning outside and from reading up a little on Thermodynamics.
Also, be careful about what youtube videos you are watching. Some of those are done with liquid which will have a difference result than gas.
|
|
|
Post by satamax on Jul 25, 2015 4:23:13 GMT -8
Also, be careful about what youtube videos you are watching. Some of those are done with liquid which will have a difference result than gas. Well Daryl, usualy that's me who gives that warning! But at the same presure, gases and liquids behave the same iirc.
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Jul 25, 2015 4:34:25 GMT -8
I got kicked offline (stupid computer) and didn't get to say this: Joseph's and Vortex's stoves are very similar in that they are heating the cooktop directly. I became hooked on cooking with brick when I noticed how hot the riser got. Why shoot the heat out the side of the stove? I'm deeply interested to see what people come up with for cooking using a vertical burn box. donkey32.proboards.com/thread/703/vortex-stoveLooks like the exit is on the top
|
|
|
Post by peterberg on Jul 25, 2015 5:30:45 GMT -8
And last but not least, could this lead to a portless batchbox? I mean, a big L tube, of serious dimensions, which would be crammed with wood, but short of the secondary air tube, and this tube would do the mixing. As long as it is capable of inducing the double vortex. The crux of the whole batch box is this phenomenon, according to Larry Winiarski. It ought to be possible to use other means in order to get the vortex going.
|
|